Tuesday, May 12, 2015



Thoughts on sustainability, urban acupuncture, and moving forward.

Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature
In his presentation, “Sustainable Urbanism:  Urban Design With Nature,” Douglas Farr talked about some projects as examples of very ‘green’ LEED buildings that would have been better to not have been built at all because they were located in very un-green locations such as surrounded by a sea of parking pavement and next to an auto oriented multi-lane Texas highway; a new school built outside of town requiring vehicular transportation to replace one in a walkable neighborhood; or a fitness center with an escalator to get to the front door. My first response to Farr’s opinion was agreement – it didn’t seem to make sense (some were just plain silly) to go to all the effort and expense for supposedly sustainable buildings in such isolated and unsustainable environments and then be applauded for earning LEED certification.  But, in thinking further, I do not agree that the projects should not have been built. 

We are in the process of learning to understand what sustainability is and how to design appropriately and wisely.  The process of learning includes the growing pains of making mistakes and then learning from those mistakes. For example, single use zoning and subdivisions in the country were thought to be good solutions to growing city problems but have learned (hopefully) that they actually created more problems.  Not that zoning or housing estates were bad ideas but we see now that zoning laws need to be adjusted for an appropriate mix of uses and designs and more complete communities need to be created to reduce dependency on vehicles – become more sustainable.  And so we continue to learn from mistakes, like those Douglas Farr referred to, and move forward.

“The only way to avoid making mistakes is not to do anything.  And that...will be the ultimate mistake.  Goh Keng Swee, founder/chief architect of modern Singapore and former deputy prime minister

Farr also expresses the opinion that we are not going to get to where we need to go by doing it (sustainability) one building at a time.  I feel that it has to start there, though.  One building or small project can get the process going.  In his "04.14.2010 Sustainable City" presentation, Jaime Lemer talks about what he calls urban acupuncture.  He said, “Sometimes planning takes time and it has to take time, but sometimes you can choose some focal points, focal ideas, and you can provide a new energy that could help the whole process of planning.”  Some projects in Boise that I think function as urban acupuncture and influence Boise city planning include: 

Boise Greenbelt
This site gives an overview of the greenbelt history  





                                                                             (grovehotelboise.wordpress.com)


Eighth Street and The Grove
 
                                                                                 (thebluereview.org)
                                                 (www.city_data.com) 

 36th Street Garden Center - a mixed-use community

and Bown Crossing



References:   
Farr, Douglas. “Sustainable Urbanism:  Urban Design With Nature”.


Lemer, Jaime . "04.14.2010 Sustainable City".